IMG/GIF McGregor/Diaz scorecard

Welcome to our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to Sign Up today.
Sign up

wiz

Posting Machine
Jan 31, 2016
3,906
4,195
the second 2 scorecards are just about right, can't complain
 

dacofty

Yea..Ok..Whatever
First 100
Jan 15, 2015
9,485
9,446
if i had to side with the judges the 47-47 is about right, but if i had to make the UFC happy id side with the 2 last judges. REMEMBER its all about keeping the UFC happy
 

lowbrowpodcast

Don't be scared, homie
Apr 1, 2016
72
134
This is basically how I would have scored it. I can see the third round as a 10-8, word from the ABC conference was that they are trying to liberalize the use of 10-8 rounds (and rightfully so), so I'm not mad at a draw either. In the moment, I scored it 48-47 for Conor.

I think this was a huge night for him, we saw him adapt tactically, which is a lot more difficult for fighters to do than people realize. Arguably Nate's biggest advantage was his vastly superior ground game, so Conor stayed off the ground with some really impressive TD defense. Arguably the biggest mistake Conor made last time was chasing a fast KO, and he fought a much more measured approach. This is pretty solid evidence that Conor might be an all-time great fighter. I'm looking forward to seeing what he does next.

Keep in mind, I watched the fight while wearing a Diaz Brothers Neighborhood Watch shirt. I am very biased towards Diaz. Sometimes you need to set that stuff aside, look at the fight objectively, and give Conor his credit.
 

Kingtony87

Batman
Feb 2, 2016
6,524
8,908
Defiantly the way i saw it. Conor winning one and two convincingly, 3 for Nate, quite possibly a 10 8 but not absolutely, Conor edging the 4th, 5th to diaz. It was a close fight.
 

Bruham

Go Steelers!
May 28, 2016
329
507
Can someone who agrees with the 10-8 3rd for Diaz tell me if they would say McGregor earned a 10-8 in the first? If not, why?

I dont mind the 10-8 for Nate, but am I wrong for thinking then the first should've been 10-8 too?