Tom Hanks’ son Chet Hanks replies to people on his 'Illuminati' tattooIf even half of this is true @Enock-O-Lypse Now! just got himself a new convert and I'm going full ctard
The CIA and the KGB both tried to shame the president of Indonesia in the 1950s with pictures and video claiming to be him engaged in sex with multiple women. Apparently the plan failed when he was excited about being able to see this video. Who would have thought that a man with five wives would be unashamed about having sex with many beautiful women?
LPC is the only of the 3 biggest parties (Yes, I realize it's a very, very distant 3rd) that will allow dissenting opinions to rise in the party. As a result, they often end up with bad candidates.
Wow, that site is a treasure trove of hidden truths!
im pretty sure that i agree with you. but i am not positive since i have no fucking clue what an "aspersion" isI fucking hate that we've developed into a society where people go to such lengths merely to cast aspersions.
It's a fancy word for fancy smarty pants people.im pretty sure that i agree with you. but i am not positive since i have no fucking clue what an "aspersion" is
![]()
Well, I could be wrong, but I believe aspersion is an old, old wooden ship that was used during the Civil War era.im pretty sure that i agree with you. but i am not positive since i have no fucking clue what an "aspersion" is
![]()
The pandemic has been the number one global topic of conversation for more than two years.I don't know if my best friend is vaccinated or who she voted for. And I hope she never tells me.
settle down justinEh Bud, did you read those comments, eh. We should be locking these people up bud.
Oh yeah, I guess it's ALL me, I just can't interact with anyone.You don't need to. You do need to respect the general idea of focusing on the topic and not turning everything into ad hominem about the person. You're disrespectful to everyone else attempting to participate in a discourse by turning it into a flaming session. You're gonna find yourself banned if you can't check yourself and call a topic stupid instead of another person that posts here.
Your next pink will be quite extended.
It's a fancy word for fancy smarty pants people.
I don't know what it means either, but I overheard someone say it and want to sound sophistimicated.
Teacher! TEACHER!@Splinty - I can't believe you can be bothered to read it, but if you can, have a look at who is trying to speak on topic, and who is absolutely not going to participate in any discussion or give the other person a chance, no matter what.
General - Gaetzgate
I love how there's just a different set of rules for politicians. Makes you feel so good about what kind of people they must be. Makes me think of how much big shots used to be able to get away with, before cell phones, and before people could be tracked so easily. Like how cops used to be...themmacommunity.com
"As I said, you're very naive. You only have to walk into Hy's Steakhouse and see sworn enemies playing grab ass together a handful of times to realize that it's Pro-Wrestling."
Okay.
So, which "sworn enemies" in Canada's Parliament are sharing a table at a steakhouse? And why is that so completely unacceptable that politicians from different parties in a Western democracy might socialise together?"
Over the next page, I asked him to clarify HIS statement SIX times. Which sworn enemies are eating steaks together at Hy's? Names? Why is this so wrong?
He is absolutely incapable of even beginning to attempt to answer that question, and clarify HIS OWN bullshit. Plenty of time to tell me what a cunt I am, though.
Then, after trying and failing six times to get him to answer the most basic question about HIS OWN statement, I got frustrated called him an arrogant simpleton.
But yeah........ absolutely all me. If I'm not even allowed to ask someone here to clarify his own statements in a "discussion" thread on a "discussion" board because I'm not willing to treat it like a virtual high school, then may as well just permaban me eh?
??
You’re yelling about someone who has u on ignore now@Splinty - I can't believe you can be bothered to read it, but if you can, have a look at who is trying to speak on topic, and who is absolutely not going to participate in any discussion or give the other person a chance, no matter what.
General - Gaetzgate
I love how there's just a different set of rules for politicians. Makes you feel so good about what kind of people they must be. Makes me think of how much big shots used to be able to get away with, before cell phones, and before people could be tracked so easily. Like how cops used to be...themmacommunity.com
"As I said, you're very naive. You only have to walk into Hy's Steakhouse and see sworn enemies playing grab ass together a handful of times to realize that it's Pro-Wrestling."
Okay.
So, which "sworn enemies" in Canada's Parliament are sharing a table at a steakhouse? And why is that so completely unacceptable that politicians from different parties in a Western democracy might socialise together?"
Over the next page, I asked him to clarify HIS statement SIX times. Which sworn enemies are eating steaks together at Hy's? Names? Why is this so wrong?
He is absolutely incapable of even beginning to attempt to answer that question, and clarify HIS OWN bullshit. Plenty of time to tell me what a cunt I am, though.
Then, after trying and failing six times to get him to answer the most basic question about HIS OWN statement, I got frustrated called him an arrogant simpleton.
But yeah........ absolutely all me. If I'm not even allowed to ask someone here to clarify his own statements in a "discussion" thread on a "discussion" board because I'm not willing to treat it like a virtual high school, then may as well just permaban me eh?
??
Look, let's be real. I'm eventually gonna be permanently pinked no matter what. It's been made very clear to me that this is a little online social club for people who have been here for years and consider themselves real life friends, and that I am not welcome here because I'm not interested in that. Who cares? It's an online forum.You’re yelling about someone who has u on ignore now
![]()
I think it's clear that you should discuss rather than argue. You seem to push the boundaries when it comes to that.Look, let's be real. I'm eventually gonna be permanently pinked no matter what. It's been made very clear to me that this is a little online social club for people who have been here for years and consider themselves real life friends, and that I am not welcome here because I'm not interested in that. Who cares? It's an online forum.
??
What does a "discussion" look like to you?I think it's clear that you should discuss rather than argue. You seem to push the boundaries when it comes to that.
You're discussing so far, but if I were to fail to agree to what you posted and then you got ever more vehement and aggressive, that would be arguing. If you followed that by hurling insults, you'd get pinked.What does a "discussion" look like to you?
In a discussion, both participants should - at the most basic level - be expected to be willing to expand on or clarify statements they themselves make, right?
Am I "arguing" now?
??