D
Did you expect it to be?
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
Dunno. I mean, theres a way to make anything in the best or worst light.
This is leaning towards as bad as it could be.
I just get this stomach ache every time I hear her talk and tried to watch it but again it started again and now I'm dry heaving
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
She spends the interview rewriting how she should have turned around and told donald trump he's a creep and told him to get out of her space during the debate....
The idea that trump is looming over her is pure television optics.
The closest they ever were is this position. It of course shows him looming over her in the television. But you'll notice that he still at his podium.
He always is.
It's bad for specific optics of course...
But it required her to walk across the stage to be front and center.
She's over near his podium.
None of that's a problem. Might have even been a smart play to create the camera optics.
But at no point did she keep feeling he was in her space as she walked across the stage closer to him over and over. And he was at his lectern the entire time, simply never sitting which was probably it's own goal for optics.
Pure revision after she's watched the tapes a million times to see something only shown to third parties.
She probably came up with this excuse somewhere between blaming Bernie and the alternate nasal breathing yoga she referenced.
Best part of the interview:
View: https://youtu.be/OZ-Q04OWTG8?t=12m15s
Worst part of the interview:
View: https://youtu.be/OZ-Q04OWTG8?t=12m26s
View: https://youtu.be/OZ-Q04OWTG8?t=12m15s
Worst part of the interview:
View: https://youtu.be/OZ-Q04OWTG8?t=12m26s
What was deplorable, is CBS' airing that.
Enabling the "White America" narrative, allowing without reprimand Hillary to call the President a creep, still pushing the Russia narrative.....it's really something watching a media coup in the United States in my lifetime.
We hear about these things in other countries before the downfall, usually "2nd world" countries, but this is really something.
I'm surprised they allowed the reference to Hillary's book, "by Simon & Schuster publications, a CBS affiliate", to be aired, allowing viewers with a brain to realize the obvious connection with CBS, Hillary, and more importantly, the true establishment.
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
Actually, I'm not sure they do. Pretty much everyone has turned on her. You should see the vitriol on many of the left leaning blogs now that she is popping up again. People want her to "just go away!" for fear she will cost them more elections. And I think that's a reasonable concern.
@MMA Expert Skip Bayless has no love lost on this woman and he once told me he would kill my first born to turn TMMAC into a co-op. And her attacks on Bernie haven't exactly fix that wing, which is the lefty socialist wing she was rejecting.Hillary is closer to George Bush 2.0...I'm serious...with an interesting at attempt at public make over circa 2016 as some far left crusader, something she never really was.
The Media is controlled by the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), they do what every they are told ...same can be said for Hillary as well.....
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba9wxl1Dmas
Interesting how no elaboration was made on the conversation between Obama and Hillary when she called the White House.
I'd imagine, "can we keep this guy out, what do we do?"
Emergency Bildeberg session?
Trump is an enigma.
It's almost like he CAN'T be physically assassinated, hence character assassination.
What happens next is anybody's guess, certainly a war of some kind.
5 minutes in but I gotta bail on it.
However, what was so bad or upsetting about what she said?
However, what was so bad or upsetting about what she said?
Well, from a supporter standpoint who has intelligence, if there is such a thing, certainly her double-talk and blaming everyone but herself.
For someone in the middle of the road, I suppose her true character comes out, which is that she has none.
She comes across as an entitled sociopath.
I'd use the word BIIIIIIIIITTTTCCCCHHHHH
We weren't exactly the target demographic of this interview
So do you or don't you have an actual quote or part of the video that supports your clearly *unbiased* opinion?
I'm not watching but it's reassuring to see her hanging onto her Chairman Mao look.
The Mao-tfits were a highlight of the campaign.
The Mao-tfits were a highlight of the campaign.
They're posted above for you viewing enjoyment ^^^, knock yourself out
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
Objectively, she remains out of touch with two historical allied groups she and Dems need to win.
She still blames Bernie as a fault issue for supporting a contingent that wants their ideas into the Democrats platform. They were a loud enough voice in the primary to warrant making peace. Instead they are still disregarded as sort of just not getting on board instead of her not getting on board more with a crowd that said, "we will hop to trump for anti-tpp, jobs, and protectionist policies". Bernie crowd didn't like Trump's social rhetoric, but the blue collar workers weren't on the Bernie wagon for his waxing poetic about Democratic socialism and social justice. They heard anti-tpp and jobs and American focus.
Likewise Clinton's weakass response that implied she had all the answers and anyone voting against her just wanted anger and a reality show still insults those people. Obama voters that moved to Trump, and gave him the election, weren't just angry. They wanted a different priority of policies. They want, and still want, JOBS. Clinton ran a campaign half in and half, trying to bolster Obama and yet talk about change. The reality is that the recovery of GDP left all these people out and everytime she celebrated how great the economy was doing, and we need more of the same, it was a 'fuck you, go change jobs at 50' implication. Yes I think she comes across callous and unlikeable as a whole, but is she is completely tone deaf to the crowd that chose this election (the great blue wall).
And finally, her disregard that she labeled half of Trump supporters as "deplorable", with no further qualifying statements, shows that she still is out of touch. While attempting to skewer Trump for being divisive, she basically left 100% of trump supporters, and independents considering trump, wondering if she was talking about them.
She still has such I lack of self awareness that she can't see her responsibility in driving people away and simultaneously undercutting any of her attacks on trump about being divisive.
And that's just all of her potential supporters that she ran off and still doesn't get it.
Her detractors have long said she was arrogant, emotional, even a drunk, and felt she was "owed the presidency". So what does she do to prove them wrong? Doesn't even write a concession speech. Hide away for a night. Talked about a year later still being so broken by it. Makes jokes about all the wine it took to get over it (joke or not, just falls into the whole string).
So yeah, not a good look if you want to really know why you lost. Trump didn't just run a reality show. He was focused on the topics people wanted the priorities to be on. She should have reprioritized and stopped disregarding many opponents and allies alike.
D
Deleted member 1
Guest
The Democrats will never win the Kid Rock vote with this strategy.