I didn't care for it.Nosferatu (2024)
8/10
After mixed reviews between critics and regular viewers I did what I rarely do and sided with critics, who generally loved it. Visually it’s a great piece of moviemaking. Plays a little bit with the plot points of the 1922 original, but generally sticks to the story. Most regular viewers said it was boring but I watched the extended cut and didn’t find it so. Can’t help but think the haters either don’t know or just don’t understand the original.
It does expect you to pull a lot out of context. I will admit I probably mentally filled in the blanks due to familiarity with the original, which I just rewatched on Halloween, as well as having read Dracula probably 10 or 15 times since 7th grade.I didn't care for it.
It mixed Nosferatu with Dracula and claimed it was an "inspired" movie.
The visuals were excellent though as was set and costume.
The story though was poorly told and the film didn't assist there at all.
It was too muddy in it's storyline.
5/10.
Totally understand how the Nosferatu film ripped off Dracula and the history mixes the two.It does expect you to pull a lot out of context. I will admit I probably mentally filled in the blanks due to familiarity with the original, which I just rewatched on Halloween, as well as having read Dracula probably 10 or 15 times since 7th grade.
As far as “mixing” Dracula and Nosferatu, that’s simply by default. Nosferatu is an unauthorized adaption of Dracula (the novel) that Murnau tried to skirt by changing some character names. Didn’t work, and he got sued and had to pay Stoker’s widow. Also, all copies were supposed to be destroyed but a few incomplete ones survived, so basically it exists today as a bootleg.
I'd never heard of the entire thing until I saw the trailer yesterday and found it fascinating.Was gonna post the doc, basically he noticed that the screen was a repeating pattern and was able to master it but watching vcr recordings non stop.
Press Your Luck scandal - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
read the wiki, he was always looking for quick rich schemes, was being charged for an MLM scam, he was kind of a scumbag.I'd never heard of the entire thing until I saw the trailer yesterday and found it fascinating.
I started the docu last night as I wanted to watch it before the movie. In the beginning, they talk to a few producers & showrunners saying how they didn't like him, he was weird, etc...I'm expecting it to turn into some kinda conspiracy or rigging the show or nefarious plot. Then it seems like he just memorized the path of the boxes, as well as which two slots whammys never landed in.
Now the people in the beginning saying they didn't like him seem just sour because he figured out the loophole in their show & worked it for over a hundred grand. lmao
Yeah, the show didn't want to pay him, they thought he was cheating, he just memorized the patterns.I'm expecting it to turn into some kinda conspiracy or rigging the show or nefarious plot. Then it seems like he just memorized the path of the boxes, as well as which two slots whammys never landed in.
Yeah, the docu talked about him always wanting to get rich quick. I didn't know about the MLM.read the wiki, he was always looking for quick rich schemes, was being charged for an MLM scam, he was kind of a scumbag.
Watching a docu on him now. Apparently he got busted because he incorporated a fake business under a family member's name, hired himself, then fired himself so he could collect unemployment.read the wiki, he was always looking for quick rich schemes, was being charged for an MLM scam, he was kind of a scumbag.
Watched this last night, part 1 was good, went to shit in part 2"The Gorge."
6/10 maybe 6.5.
Kind of a weird zombie meets gov't movie.
The trailer alone looks fucked upSorcerer (1977)
7/10
Still processing it